Difference between revisions of "June 28, 2019"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | == Low redshift bin: == | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | [[File:347 cls lambda 20to1000 z pt10topt34 og.png| frame|none|alt=Alt text| Low redshift bin stack on Redmapper clusters in ACT+Planck y map, richness > 20]] | |
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:Des halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt10topt33 347 cls.png | frame|none|alt=Alt text | Halo masses (calculated from weak lensing relation) for low redshift bin , lambda>20 Redmapper clusters ]] |
| − | [[File:Des halo masses lambda 20to1000 | + | [[File:Pkp halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt10topt33 816 cls.png |frame|none|alt=Alt text | Halo masses for Peak Patch halos in the same mass range + redshift bin]] |
| − | [[File:Pkp halo masses lambda 20to1000 | + | [[File:Radial prof dat filteredsim plus gauss lambda 20to1000 z pt10topt34 og.png |frame|none|alt=Alt text | Radial profile comparison of stack on clusters in Websky map vs ACT map, with 2' Gaussian scaled to the amplitude of the stack on data.]] |
| − | [[File:Radial prof | ||
| − | == High redshift bin == | + | |
| − | [[File:149 cls lambda 20to1000 z pt62topt95 og.png]] | + | |
| − | [[File:Des halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt61topt94 149 cls.png]] | + | == Medium redshift bin: == |
| − | [[File:Pkp halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt61topt94 2605 cls.png]] | + | |
| − | [[File:Radial prof datsim plus gauss lambda 20to1000 z pt62topt95 og.png]] | + | [[File:888 cls lambda 20to1000 z pt34topt62 og.png | frame|none|alt=Alt text| Medium redshift bin stack on Redmapper clusters in ACT+Planck y map, richness > 20]] |
| + | [[File:Des halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt33topt61 888 cls.png | frame|none|alt=Alt text| Halo masses (calculated from weak lensing relation) for medium redshift bin , lambda>20 Redmapper clusters ]] | ||
| + | [[File:Pkp halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt33topt61 2142 cls.png | frame|none|alt=Alt text| Halo masses for Peak Patch halos in the same mass range + redshift bin]] | ||
| + | [[File:Radial prof datsim plus gauss lambda 20to1000 z pt34topt62 og.png |frame|none|alt=Alt text| Radial profile comparison of stack on clusters in Websky map vs ACT map, with 2' Gaussian scaled to the amplitude of the stack on data.]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == High redshift bin: == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:149 cls lambda 20to1000 z pt62topt95 og.png |frame|none|alt=Alt text| High redshift bin stack on Redmapper clusters in ACT+Planck y map, richness > 20 ]] | ||
| + | [[File:Des halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt61topt94 149 cls.png |frame|none|alt=Alt text| Halo masses (calculated from weak lensing relation) for high redshift bin , lambda>20 Redmapper clusters]] | ||
| + | [[File:Pkp halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt61topt94 2605 cls.png | frame|none|alt=Alt text| Halo masses for Peak Patch halos in the same mass range + redshift bin ]] | ||
| + | [[File:Radial prof datsim plus gauss lambda 20to1000 z pt62topt95 og.png | frame|none|alt=Alt text| Radial profile comparison of stack on clusters in Websky map vs ACT map, with 2' Gaussian scaled to the amplitude of the stack on data. ]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:44, 12 July 2019
Unoriented Stacks Updates
Back when I had first made unoriented stacks on clusters in the ACT y map and on the Websky y map, the two profiles had been quite different. I fixed a few things:
1) The smoothing scale was slightly different between the two (I had a factor off in the FWHM to sigma conversion of the Gaussian beam) 2) The mass bins did not match well. I was matching by number and taking the top most massive Peak Patch halos to match the number of Redmapper clusters. I think this was including more massive PkP halos. Now I am binning clusters in richness and matching the bins for halos in the sims by using the richness-to-halo mass relation from weak lensing done for Redmapper by McClintock et al. 2018. 3) The Websky map was not filtered to match the ACT y map. I now have filtered modes of ell < 80 like Mat had done to the ACT y map.
Low redshift bin:
Low redshift bin stack on Redmapper clusters in ACT+Planck y map, richness > 20
Halo masses (calculated from weak lensing relation) for low redshift bin , lambda>20 Redmapper clusters
Halo masses for Peak Patch halos in the same mass range + redshift bin
Radial profile comparison of stack on clusters in Websky map vs ACT map, with 2' Gaussian scaled to the amplitude of the stack on data.
Medium redshift bin:
Medium redshift bin stack on Redmapper clusters in ACT+Planck y map, richness > 20
Halo masses (calculated from weak lensing relation) for medium redshift bin , lambda>20 Redmapper clusters
Halo masses for Peak Patch halos in the same mass range + redshift bin
Radial profile comparison of stack on clusters in Websky map vs ACT map, with 2' Gaussian scaled to the amplitude of the stack on data.
High redshift bin:
High redshift bin stack on Redmapper clusters in ACT+Planck y map, richness > 20
Halo masses (calculated from weak lensing relation) for high redshift bin , lambda>20 Redmapper clusters
Halo masses for Peak Patch halos in the same mass range + redshift bin
Radial profile comparison of stack on clusters in Websky map vs ACT map, with 2' Gaussian scaled to the amplitude of the stack on data.