Difference between revisions of "Jan 27, 2022 - Considering shear"

From LSS Mocks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "During Jason's presentation at Penn it was commented that we should probably also include shear in the magnification coefficients, given that it is the same order as kappa^2 w...")
 
 
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
<math>
 
<math>
{}_2a_{lm}^+ = -\left(\kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots}) + \kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots})\right) = \kappa_{lm}\sqrt{\dots} = - \gamma_{lm}
+
{}_2a_{lm}^+ = -\left(\kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots}) + \kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots})\right)/2 = \kappa_{lm}\sqrt{\dots} = - \gamma_{lm}
 
</math>
 
</math>
  
 
<math>
 
<math>
{}_2a_{lm}^- = -\left(\kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots}) - \kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots})\right) = 0
+
{}_2a_{lm}^- = -\left(\kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots}) - \kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots})\right)/2i = 0
 
</math>
 
</math>
  

Latest revision as of 15:05, 28 January 2022

During Jason's presentation at Penn it was commented that we should probably also include shear in the magnification coefficients, given that it is the same order as kappa^2 we find significant.

Based on information presented in the DES paper and Healpix convention we have

[math]\displaystyle{ \gamma_1 + i \gamma_2 = \gamma = \sum_{lm} \gamma_{lm} {}_2Y_{lm} = \sum_{lm} \left(- \sqrt{\frac{(l-1)(l+2)}{l(l+1)}}\right)\kappa_{lm}{}_2Y_{lm} }[/math] [math]\displaystyle{ \gamma_1 - i \gamma_2 = \gamma^* = \sum_{lm} \gamma_{lm}^* {}_2Y_{lm}^* = \sum_{lm} \left(- \sqrt{\frac{(l-1)(l+2)}{l(l+1)}}\right)\kappa_{lm}^*{}_2Y_{lm}^* = \sum_{lm} \left(- \sqrt{\frac{(l-1)(l+2)}{l(l+1)}}\right)\kappa_{lm}{}_{-2}Y_{lm} }[/math]

In the Healpix convention we have the values entering alm2map_spin (notice the minus sign at the end)

[math]\displaystyle{ {}_2a_{lm}^+ = -\left(\kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots}) + \kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots})\right)/2 = \kappa_{lm}\sqrt{\dots} = - \gamma_{lm} }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ {}_2a_{lm}^- = -\left(\kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots}) - \kappa_{lm}(-\sqrt{\dots})\right)/2i = 0 }[/math]

The two maps that are returned are then

[math]\displaystyle{ {}_2S^+ = (\gamma + \gamma^*)/2 = \gamma_1 }[/math]

[math]\displaystyle{ {}_2S^- = (\gamma - \gamma^*)/2i = \gamma_2 }[/math]