Difference between revisions of "June 28, 2019"
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
− | == Low redshift bin == | + | === Low redshift bin === |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | [[File:347 cls lambda 20to1000 z pt10topt34 og.png | left | thumb | upright=1.5 | Low redshift bin stack on Redmapper clusters in ACT+Planck y map, richness > 20]] [[File:Des halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt10topt33 347 cls.png | left | thumb| upright=1.5 | Halo masses (calculated from weak lensing relation) for low redshift bin , lambda>20 Redmapper clusters ]] [[File:Pkp halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt10topt33 816 cls.png | left| thumb | upright=1.5 | Halo masses for Peak Patch halos in the same mass range + redshift bin]] | ||
+ | [[File:Radial prof dat filteredsim plus gauss lambda 20to1000 z pt10topt34 og.png | left| thumb |upright=1.5 | Radial profile comparison of stack on clusters in Websky map vs ACT map, with 2' Gaussian scaled to the amplitude of the stack on data.]] | ||
− | == High redshift bin == | + | |
− | [[File:149 cls lambda 20to1000 z pt62topt95 og.png]] | + | |
− | [[File:Des halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt61topt94 149 cls.png]] | + | |
− | [[File:Pkp halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt61topt94 2605 cls.png]] | + | |
− | [[File:Radial prof datsim plus gauss lambda 20to1000 z pt62topt95 og.png]] | + | |
+ | |||
+ | === Medium redshift bin === | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:888 cls lambda 20to1000 z pt34topt62 og.png | left| thumb | upright=1.5 | Medium redshift bin stack on Redmapper clusters in ACT+Planck y map, richness > 20]] [[File:Des halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt33topt61 888 cls.png | left | thumb| upright=1.5 | Halo masses (calculated from weak lensing relation) for medium redshift bin , lambda>20 Redmapper clusters ]] [[File:Pkp halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt33topt61 2142 cls.png | left | thumb |upright=1.5 | Halo masses for Peak Patch halos in the same mass range + redshift bin]] [[File:Radial prof datsim plus gauss lambda 20to1000 z pt34topt62 og.png | left | thumb |upright=1.5 | Radial profile comparison of stack on clusters in Websky map vs ACT map, with 2' Gaussian scaled to the amplitude of the stack on data.]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | === High redshift bin === | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:149 cls lambda 20to1000 z pt62topt95 og.png | left| thumb | upright=1.5 | High redshift bin stack on Redmapper clusters in ACT+Planck y map, richness > 20 ]] [[File:Des halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt61topt94 149 cls.png | left| thumb|upright=1.5 | Halo masses (calculated from weak lensing relation) for high redshift bin , lambda>20 Redmapper clusters]] [[File:Pkp halo masses lambda 20to1000 zpt61topt94 2605 cls.png | left | thumb | upright=1.5 | Halo masses for Peak Patch halos in the same mass range + redshift bin ]] [[File:Radial prof datsim plus gauss lambda 20to1000 z pt62topt95 og.png | left | thumb | upright=1.5 | Radial profile comparison of stack on clusters in Websky map vs ACT map, with 2' Gaussian scaled to the amplitude of the stack on data. ]] |
Revision as of 20:37, 12 July 2019
Unoriented Stacks Updates
Back when I had first made unoriented stacks on clusters in the ACT y map and on the Websky y map, the two profiles had been quite different. I fixed a few things:
1) The smoothing scale was slightly different between the two (I had a factor off in the FWHM to sigma conversion of the Gaussian beam) 2) The mass bins did not match well. I was matching by number and taking the top most massive Peak Patch halos to match the number of Redmapper clusters. I think this was including more massive PkP halos. Now I am binning clusters in richness and matching the bins for halos in the sims by using the richness-to-halo mass relation from weak lensing done for Redmapper by McClintock et al. 2018. 3) The Websky map was not filtered to match the ACT y map. I now have filtered modes of ell < 80 like Mat had done to the ACT y map.
Low redshift bin
Medium redshift bin