Lensed cib

On this page you will find simulation products and supplementary figures to accompany the paper Exploring the Non-Gaussianity of the Cosmic Infrared Background and Its Weak Gravitational Lensing - J. Lee, J. R. Bond, P. Motloch, A. van Engelen, G. Stein (2024).

Simulation Products

Unlensed CIB mocks from this work can be accessed here, and lensed CIB mocks can be accessed here.

Supplementary Figures

• 

  Slice Lensing

Figure 1: CIB intensity, the corresponding lensing potential kernels, as well as the RMS deflection for each redshift shell ([math]\displaystyle{ \Delta z = 0.2 }[/math]) within our Websky CIB model. The CIB intensity increases from [math]\displaystyle{ z = 0 }[/math] to [math]\displaystyle{ z = 1.4 }[/math], peaks around [math]\displaystyle{ z = 1.4 }[/math] to [math]\displaystyle{ 1.6 }[/math], then decreases until it is almost non-existent by [math]\displaystyle{ z = 4 }[/math]. The lensing kernels, defined as [math]\displaystyle{ W_{z_i^{\text{src}}}^{\kappa} = \frac{3}{2} \Omega_m H_0 ^2 \frac{1+z}{H(z)}\chi(z) \big[ \frac{\chi(z_i^{\text{src}})-\chi(z)}{\chi(z_i^{\text{src}})}\big] }[/math] with [math]\displaystyle{ z_i^{\text{src}} }[/math] being the midpoint of each redshift shell in [math]\displaystyle{ z }[/math]-space, typically peak around half of its extent, although they display some skew towards where the CIB intensity is highest, especially as we integrate over more redshifts. The RMS deflection steeply increases at first from [math]\displaystyle{ 0.34~\mathrm{arcmin} }[/math] for the first lensed shell, up to [math]\displaystyle{ 1.7~\mathrm{arcmin} }[/math] for the last shell.

• 

  Deck of cards

Figure 2: A patch of unlensed CIB and its corresponding lensing convergence for each redshift shell [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta z = 0.2 }[/math]. In our simulations, each unlensed CIB shell is lensed by a convergence shell to create lensed CIB shells, which are then summed up to produce the total lensed CIB map. This method mitigates the "self-lensing" effect substantially. Note that the CIB intensity visibly thins out by [math]\displaystyle{ z = 3 }[/math], while the integrated lensing convergence becomes brighter at higher redshifts.

• 

  Animation

Figure 3: HealPix maps of unlensed, deflected (no magnification), and lensed CIB for a small ([math]\displaystyle{ 0.5^\circ \times 0.5^\circ }[/math]) patch of sky centered on [math]\displaystyle{ z = 1.1 }[/math]. Here, a "lensed" galaxy has both been deflected and has had its flux density magnified appropriately. The arrows denote the direction and magnitude of deflection. The light circled patch (Unlensed and Deflected) and the dark circled patch (Deflected and Lensed) are the same small patch of sky emphasized. One can clearly see the deflection by comparing the Unlensed and Deflected, and the magnification effect by comparing the Deflected and Lensed.

• 

  WebSky vs Planck unlensed

Figure 4: Statistics of the unlensed CIB maps from the Websky simulations at the three Planck frequencies; top (blue) is 545 GHz, middle (green) is 353 GHz, and bottom (red) is 217 GHz. As we go to higher-order statistics, the Poisson regime becomes more evident as the spectra flatten out at [math]\displaystyle{ \ell \gt 1000 }[/math]. We note that the Websky bispectra are mostly within Planck error bars even though only the power spectra were fit to match those of Planck's. While we do not plot the error bars for Websky values as there is only one realization, one can estimate the level of uncertainty from the scatter especially for the bispectra and kurtosis.

• 

  WebSky unlensed vs no kapmax with sigma smoothed

Figure 5: The effect of gravitational lensing on CIB statistics using lensing convergence maps smoothed at the pixel level. While the power spectra are changed by less than 2% for all three frequencies, the bispectra and kurtosis change by 10 to 40% at low [math]\displaystyle{ \ell }[/math]. The apparent discrepancy between frequencies for the bispectra and kurtosis arises due to the relatively high flux cut values for Planck at lower frequencies.

• 

  Websky vs Planck with gamma lensed

Figure 6: Comparison of unlensed and lensed Websky bispectra with Planck measurements. Points are computed at the same set of central [math]\displaystyle{ \ell }[/math] values but are horizontally offset for clarity. The lensed values are slightly larger than unlensed values and hence closer to Planck values.