May 4th, 2020 - CIB Lensing: Field Contribution to Kappa (Shells)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Here, I have the variance, skewness, and kurtosis by [math]\displaystyle{ \ell }[/math] ([math]\displaystyle{ \Delta \ell = 200 }[/math]) for each [math]\displaystyle{ \kappa }[/math] (total and field-only) shell covering up to z = 4.0. (There were no CIB pixels at z > 4.2) I also show how much the field contributes to the total [math]\displaystyle{ \kappa }[/math] for each shell.
Shell # and Corresponding redshifts 'z' (All shells start from z = 0.05) Shell 2 : z_max = 0.2, z_source = 0.3 (lenses CIB shell from z = 0.2 to 0.4) Shell 3 : z_max = 0.4, z_source = 0.5 (lenses CIB shell from z = 0.4 to 0.6) ... and so on until ... Shell 21 : z_max = 4.0, z_source = 4.1 (lenses CIB shell from z = 4.0 to 4.2)
- As expected, the field dominates each of the shells at low [math]\displaystyle{ \ell }[/math] for all 3 statistics, but the cut-off seems to be less than [math]\displaystyle{ \ell = 1000 }[/math] for the 2-point and less than 500 for the 3 and 4-points. - With these plots, it is hard to tell where the scattering effects at [math]\displaystyle{ \ell \gt 2000 }[/math] evident in the lensed vs. unlensed 3-point plots are coming from. It is odd that the field [math]\displaystyle{ \kappa }[/math], whose 3-point is orders of magnitudes lower than the total [math]\displaystyle{ \kappa }[/math] is causing these effects.
Shell 2 (z_max = 0.2, z_source = 0.3) Order: [math]\displaystyle{ \lt \sigma^2\gt }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ \lt \sigma^3\gt }[/math], [math]\displaystyle{ \lt \sigma^4\gt }[/math]
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 3 (z_max = 0.4, z_source = 0.5)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 4 (z_max = 0.6, z_source = 0.7)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 5 (z_max = 0.8, z_source = 0.9)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 6 (z_max = 1.0, z_source = 1.1)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 7 (z_max = 1.2, z_source = 1.3)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 8 (z_max = 1.4, z_source = 1.5)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 9 (z_max = 1.6, z_source = 1.7)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 10 (z_max = 1.8, z_source = 1.9)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 11 (z_max = 2.0, z_source = 2.1)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 12 (z_max = 2.2, z_source = 2.3)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 13 (z_max = 2.4, z_source = 2.5)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 14 (z_max = 2.6, z_source = 2.7)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 15 (z_max = 2.8, z_source = 2.9)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 16 (z_max = 3.0, z_source = 3.1)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 17 (z_max = 3.2, z_source = 3.3)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 18 (z_max = 3.4, z_source = 3.5)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 19 (z_max = 3.6, z_source = 3.7)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 20 (z_max = 3.8, z_source = 3.9)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -
Shell 21 (z_max = 4.0, z_source = 4.1)
- Total (Field + Halo) vs. Field -
- Field / Total -